Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
What I’ve done recently and a link to a very simple butterfly bookmark.
Pdf Diagrams Simple Butterfly Bookmark: img003-1 creative commons applies as usual.
So Himanshu Agrawal asked a week or two ago about doing diagrams for a bookmark I posted pictoral diagrams for and I said sure that sounds great. Wow are his diagrams wonderful. I did not expect anything so wonderfully done and really appreciate the work he put into it. Diagramming is a talent I don’t have and Himanshu’s diagrams are concise and even are colored. He is on facebook and flickr.
Link to an amazing dragon done for Dell computers from his flickr pics-amazing!
So what have I done? Singapore-Will elaborate later, but a thanks to Deb (coffee, allergy meds, and dopamine?), Elsa (helped me find my classroom and more), Cheng Chit (so much, organization, tour guide, and great help), Char (great suggestions, much to mull over), Shri (best and most helpful roommate ever), the Demaine’s (for the Huffman talk and making me think about different curves again), Patsy (for seriously doing tons of organization and being a workaholic), Eileen-for so much work into making things run smoothly, Joseph-well he puts up with my crap, Miri-some good conversations, Eves and Mark-clarification of sine curvy corrugation issues. That’s all for now although I’ll feel horribly guilty later for leaving people out. Wisconsin played with circles, Minneapolis got to see a nonfolding friend Mags and Eric a folding friend. He was great and I owe him a big thanks. Now to the folding….soo the Bauhaus circles that are fantabulous curvy magic were pictured in a presentation by Eric, so I made one (they were also rediscovered by Thoki Yenn). As is my ilk I quickly got bored with it as such and have been playing with pleating, cutting, pulling apart and collapsing to make sharp defined curves, and changing the shapes (which I brilliantly noticed today, a month later, in the abstract booklet from 50sme, seriously could I be any more oblivious?) Not all are from circles, and I have a lot of exploration to do to find the limitations. I will fully state that most likely any tweaking I do to the form has been done and better, but the reality is I don’t want to search out what other people have done until I play myself. So yes it probably is redundant, but it is a curvy fun redundancy.
Warning: These are rough pictoral diagrams and as such if you are a very basic folder they may be a problem. If using cami paper start with the colored side down.
4. Fold down in half.
5. Fold the bottom tip of the top flap to meet the top center.
6. The next step might be the most problematic. You will be taking the raw edges of the bottom you folded up and making them meet the raw edges underneath and then rabbit earing the middle flap.
7. Symmetrically squash the center flap.
8. Mountain fold across from were my two fingers are pointing to. This is a horizontal line above what will be the nose.
9. You will pinch the fold just made and form a valley fold about an eighth of an inch above it. This is a personal taste fold. It affects the amount of paper for the eyes of the dog.
10. Refer to the pics below to fold down the eyes at an angle. How close to the center is a personal preference. I fold to the edge of the crease just made from a point above the edge of the nose, on either side.
11. Fold the ears to taste
12. Mountain fold the top of the nose back to taste.
13. Fold the bottom of the nose under to taste.
15. Stick over page to mark. Only the head will show.
So I have ended up on a tangent that I would eventually like to use for posting tutorials for my students and have lectures students can view if absent. So I decided to try to create an origami tutorial. I may have done this design before I sadly don’t remember. Editing is a challenging business, as is seeing yourself (in all your redundant glory) on camera. So for those who do post tutorials online kudos, it’s a lot harder than it looks. I will within the next week post about Italy, but this comes first since it’s done. Bear with me as it is my first attempt at video instruction and it is not polished all pretty, plus I am using the camera in my mac which doesn’t allow for as much flexibility in filming. Youtube said it’s processing so here you go, remember creative commons applies to all unless stated otherwise. Happy holidays.
Below is an corrugated automata that doesn’t inch the way I originally plan, but sometimes the best laid plans fail.
What I envisioned and what happened very different. Needed at least 6″ more of paper to get the extra knot/twist it and it wasn’t worth doing it with this paper which is not good and likes to rip. It is a watercolor paper that also has no memory and is not good for my purposes:( Oh well, sometimes it justn’t turn out the way you want. That said Italy in 3 days:)
Lately, amongst other things, I’ve been playing with pleated structures. This post is to help, me more than anything else, think about the differences, similarities, and pros/cons of different types of pleating techniques.
Paul Jackson is one of the earlier artists to work with pleating. His pleated pieces are pleated (I believe) all in one direction than the other. He then uses the additional paper pleats to pull them apart creating a curve. The curve is not inherent in the pleating as in Goran Konjevod’s technique. Paul Jackson’s website is http://www.origami-artist.com/ which has galleries and a lot of great pages to find out about him and his work. Also different is that Jackson doesn’t constrain the edges. The pulling apart of the pleats is the essence of the form and the direction they are pulled in decides the finished pieces form. One of the most beautiful aspects (to me) of his work is his coloring of his pieces. I highly recommend that you look at his coloring, because the depth that it adds to the forms is amazing. The bowl in the center is probably my favorite as the center shows the most delicious shading. The third piece wouldn’t surprise you if you stumbled upon it in a thicket. His work is varied and doesn’t stop with pleated structures so going through his site you’ll see commercial work, paper engineering, crumpling and more.
Goran is known for his fantasitical explorations of pleated structures. His designs and curves come from the interacting of the pleat layers. The way the layers interact are forcing curvature. Different pleat orders create different curves. His dense pleated structures are mathematical jems as well as artistic expressions. There are an infinite number of pleating combinations and consequently an infinitely huge pleated playground. Another difference between a lot of his works is the constraint of the edges, although this isn’t present in all it is present in most.
So in the prior post one of the main differences is the constraining of the edges. The goal is not to have the whole form curve around itself. but imagine the curves are more akin to the modification of the pleats of Eric Gjerde’s Arabesque, especially for the silver piece. ”Mother and Child” is most similar to Jackson’s work in the method of curvature. Constraining edges has drawbacks in nature the solid constrained edge wouldn’t be seen, but most problematic is the tension on the edges. Short of elephant hide you are likely to rip paper with the tension.
His webite is http://www.organicorigami.com and is a great place to look at his wonderful explorations.
The thing I first did once I played with a bowl he taught was to pull it apart from the bottom, which to be honest is what I pretty much do to everything.
It can be done for space, as above, or aesthetic as below.
One of the cons of pleated structures is lost volume. Deconstructing allows you to reclaim a certain amount of space that is traditionally lost in pleated structures/containers. Of course like many things you are trading one pro for a con. When not deconstructing structures they tend to be very strong and dense. When you deconstruct the inside you end up with only one layer of paper and it is noticably less dense than the rest of the structure.
Another modification that I started playing with (and I’m glad Goran is playing with) is edge expansion. This is where all the pleats along an edge are pulled apart, you can also think of inner creases as an edge and expand them.
These two pieces combines some deconstruction and edge expansion.
One of the pros to this action is the very organic nature that it imparts to a piece, but like before when pulling apart edges it affects other nearby pleats and does weaken the overall structure. If rigidity is desired this technique is not ideal.
Probably one of my favorite modifications is the addition to traditional pleating identifiable centers that are done with initial flattened box pleating that is then shaped as desired. It gives you more opportunities to create combined pieced. A limitation is the creasing of the pleats and thickness becomes an issue the more complex the internal structure.
Future explorations involve pleating structures that arn’t 90 degree based like. In other words types of radial pleating. Another variant is only pleating certain quadrants of a piece of paper like outer corners and not doing the centers: Con: Doesn’t follow traditional pleat lines and is a pain in the bum.
I hope this helps anyone who likes to play with pleated structures and if not oh well. It is a fascinating part of paper art that can give structures that are organic and beautiful and I am happy that people like Paul Jackson and Goran Konjevod are doing/have done such nifty things.
Playing around lately, a little slow at doing things. Non uniform deformation and intentional partial crumpling. Wicked strong. I stood on it with my foot and it didn’t crush. The tighter the compression the stronger the structure.
I came across an amazing blog that has a ton of great posts on design, architecture, and artists. It isn’t strictly origami, but it has things that have some relationships to the art. I’m also not hung up on it being about origami, but on having posts/links about subjects I find interesting and this blog doesn’t fail. Check out http://dearada.typepad.com .
This is an artist that does marvelous stuff with wire, not Polly though I adore her work. http://dearada.typepad.com/dear_ada/2009/03/benedetta-mori-ubaldini.html . So much design and art and so little time.
Unrelated…. I have decided to go to Granada, Spain this summer to see the Alhambra and architecture. I would love to hear any suggestions for things to do besides the obvious places. Also if anyone is around there and interested in meeting up to fold I would love to meet. I am currently planning on going in early July.
So as some have noted photography isn’t my forte or for that matter puntuality. Some of these I’ve never posted and some I killed pics by accident so here is a bit of older stuff since I certainly havn’t been creating anything new that’s interesting. While cleaning out some old boxes I found a bunch of my old boxes from before I was tessellating. I am cleaning them off and in some cases going to redo and post (more for my limited memory than anything else) The “Saffron in Curves” was when I was playing with non linear g. pleats. The black landscape from San Fran a test and the red bowl is just a pic redo since the early pics were horrible.
Joel is and will be an insanely talented folder and is selling some of his work for a steal. Check out http://www.etsy.com/shop.php?user_id=5046064
and drool over the complexity that his work. His green angel strikes me as a bit scary and beautiful all at once. She doesn’t look like she plays, but she is exquisite
Amazing stuff as always.